![]() ![]() With Dragon Age II just around the corner, there’s no better time to not only recount the original’s most memorable and maniacal moments, but directly compare the best of the best from both of BioWare’s babies to prove Dragon Age’s dominance. Oh yeah, you’re bristling right now, indignantly clutching that 6.75-inch Commander Shepard action figure and preparing to unleash interstellar hell on that comments section, but the simple fact is that no matter how many times I admire the unlikely physics of Jack’s belt-bra, my memories of immorally wresting Ferelden from the clutches of the darkspawn are that much fonder. Mass Effect 2 was good, but Dragon Age: Origins was better. ![]() Here’s the first paragraph of the IGN write up: Well, it’s not exactly saying that Mass Effect 2 stinks, but if you read the article carefully, you’ll see what direction it’s hinting at. In the article, I’ve said why Mass Effect 2 stinks and why Dragon Age: Origin pawns. The article is called “Why Dragon Age Is More Memorable Than Mass Effect 2).”įor those who’ve been following my blog, you might have obviously read the most controversial article I wrote (the one that’s also been getting a lot of hits!). I was going through my RSS feeds this morning, and I came across an article by IGN AU’s Toby McCasker. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |